Skip Navigation



Parliamentary Affairs Advance Access published online on July 12, 2006
Parliamentary Affairs, doi:10.1093/pa/gsl020
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
59/4/654    most recent
gsl020v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Hansard Society for Parliamentary Government; all rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Contemporary Issue

A Banana Republic? The Investigation into Electoral Fraud by the Birmingham Election Court

John Stewart *

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
John Stewart, E-mail: johnstewart{at}tinyonline.co.uk


  Abstract

In 2005 an election court was held in Birmingham to determine allegations about fraud in two wards in the 2004 local elections. It found there had been fraud and corruption on a massive scale and declared the election void. The court exposed major weaknesses in the system of postal voting, which had been extended by the introduction of postal voting on demand in 2000, but without safeguards for the integrity of the electoral system at both national and local level. This article describes the proceedings of the election court against the background of the postal voting arrangements and the Birmingham context. It shows how the judgment of the court and the publicity it generated brought the issue of postal voting on to the national political agenda during the 2005 general election campaign, leading to a Government commitment to legislate.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Probation JournalHome page
S. Easton
The prisoner 's right to vote and civic responsibility: Reaffirming the social contract?
Probation Journal, September 1, 2009; 56(3): 224 - 237.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.