Skip Navigation


Parliamentary Affairs Advance Access originally published online on June 11, 2009
Parliamentary Affairs 2009 62(3):533-535; doi:10.1093/pa/gsp011
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
62/3/533    most recent
gsp011v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Hansard Society for Parliamentary Government; all rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Partisan Politics, Principle and Reform in Parliament and the Constituencies, 1869–1880: Essays in Memory of John A. Phillips

Christopher Stevens

Canterbury Christ Church University

Correspondence: cps6@canterbury.ac.uk

Partisan Politics, Principle and Reform in Parliament and the Constituencies, 1869–1880: Essays in Memory of John A. Phillips, edited by Clyve Jones, Philip Salmon, and Richard W. Davis, Edinburgh University Press for The Parliamentary History Yearbook Trust, 2005, 213pp, ISBN 07486 2346 9.

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

The editors of this welcome volume in memory of John A. Phillips have two particular challenges. The first is shared by the editors of any feschrift in an academic area where the monograph is the normal currency. That is to produce a work that offers a sustained reflection on a coherent area of study, while illuminating the scholarly contribution and the academic life of its subject. The second, peculiar to the area covered here, is to interest a market which covers two heavily demarcated periods. Despite works such as this, those who study politics and elections of the post-Peel era remain a group distinct from that researching the earlier period. . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?