Skip Navigation


Parliamentary Affairs Advance Access originally published online on January 20, 2009
Parliamentary Affairs 2009 62(2):189-195; doi:10.1093/pa/gsn050
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
62/2/189    most recent
gsn050v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Black, L.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Hansard Society for Parliamentary Government; all rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Editorial

Lawrence Black

Department of History
Durham University
UK
lawrence.black@durham.ac.uk

Gidon Cohen

School of Government and International Affairs
Durham University
UK
gidon.cohen@durham.ac.uk

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Party activism has been seen as a, or even the, core issue for those interested in political science because it combines a number of features which enable it to shed light on participatory politics, arguably the central problem in the scientific study of politics. In particular, it looks at parties, perhaps the most important non-state institutions in democratic societies. Further, and in contrast to voting, the commitments involved are of relatively high intensity and show enough variation to enable a real insight into motivations.1 From another, rather different, perspective, starting from the mass of party members and moving outwards ‘the writing of party history can be seen as the writing of the general history of a country from a monographic point of view’; thus, the study of . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?