Skip Navigation


Parliamentary Affairs Advance Access originally published online on March 8, 2006
Parliamentary Affairs 2006 59(2):350-359; doi:10.1093/pa/gsl013
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
59/2/350    most recent
gsl013v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whitaker, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Hansard Society for Parliamentary Government; all rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Backbench Influence on Government Legislation? A Flexing of Parliamentary Muscles at Westminster

Richard Whitaker1

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

MPs gave the government a rough ride in the final quarter of 2005. Blair’s government suffered its first defeat in the House of Commons and faced several other rebellions on major legislation in the lower house as well as ten defeats in the House of Lords. Crucially, in the final months of 2005 the government was forced to make concessions on several occasions in response to the threat of rebellion among Labour backbenchers. This threat is now more serious given the government’s reduced majority since the 2005 election and more credible following the defeats on the Terrorism Bill in November. Parliamentary committees were critical of the government in a number of reports dealing not only with legislation but also with the reluctance of special advisers to appear before select committees. In addition, the Modernisation Committee began an inquiry into the workings of the legislative process at Westminster. To round it . . . [Full Text of this Article]


   The legislative process: backbench influence and rebellion
 
IDENTITY CARDS.
THE TERRORISM BILL.

   Pressure from parliamentary committees
 

   Conclusions
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?