Parliamentary Affairs Advance Access originally published online on March 21, 2006
Parliamentary Affairs 2006 59(2):236-249; doi:10.1093/pa/gsl002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Hansard Society for Parliamentary Government; all rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Electrifying Democracy? 10 Years of Policy and Practice
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
THE British government has been keen to promote political participation, and strengthen democratic practices more generally, through the use of Internet-based technologies. This is unsurprising, perhaps, given the perceived crisis of Britains traditional democratic institutions, highlighted by low electoral turnouts and declining trust in politicians. However, the very fact that we can talk of a decade of e-democracy experiments is itself a creditworthy achievement. Such experiments, although designed to support our representative form of democracy, have varied greatly with elements of both direct and deliberative democracy often to the fore.
This article analyses the policy behind, and practice of, government-led electronic democracy initiatives. The policy analysis focuses on the effects of the In the Service of Democracy Green Paper. The analysis of practical experiences with e-democracy initiatives will focus on Internet-based discussion forums, consultations and voting.1 The article will also outline e-democracy initiatives at the local level, and their relationship
| Theorising the effects of e-democracy |
|---|
| The roots and rhetoric of e-democracy in the United Kingdom |
|---|
| Large-scale online discussion |
|---|
| Online consultation |
|---|
| E-democracy in local government |
|---|
| E-voting |
|---|
| Conclusion |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Wright and J. Street Democracy, deliberation and design: the case of online discussion forums New Media Society, October 1, 2007; 9(5): 849 - 869. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
