Skip Navigation

Parliamentary Affairs 2009 62(4):568-579; doi:10.1093/pa/gsp025
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rustin, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Hansard Society for Parliamentary Government; all rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

This article appears in the following Parliamentary Affairs issue: CHARTER 88 AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM MOVEMENT: TWENTY YEARS ON [View the issue table of contents]

Revisiting Charter 88

Michael Rustin

Sociology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences
University of East London
Docklands Campus
London E16 2RD
UK

Correspondence: m.j.rustin{at}uel.ac.uk

This article reviews the emergence of Charter 88 as a response to a particular political conjuncture in British politics. It argues that its programme of reform was not so much an attempt to resolve a political crisis that had proved unmanageable within the existing constitutional settlement, as an attempt to redefine and achieve the political goals of the liberal left by constitutional means. The article discusses the considerable successes of the Charter, limited only by the fact that the incoming New Labour government of 1997 could afford to dispense with the formal Liberal Democrat support on which the full implementation of the Charter 88 reform programme depended. The article describes how the deeper aim of the Charter to give radical politics in Britain a new democratic republican shape has thus been stalled, caught between the continuing sovereignty accorded by New Labour to market imperatives and their emerging new forms of governance, and a residual collectivist centralism.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.