Parliamentary Affairs Advance Access originally published online on October 19, 2007
Parliamentary Affairs 2008 61(1):99-121; doi:10.1093/pa/gsm048
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bi-constitutionality: Unravelling New Labour's Constitutional Orientations
Although there is no doubt that the British constitution has been significantly reformed since the election of Labour in May 1997, the degree to which these reforms have altered the nature of British democracy remains deeply contested. A major problem within this debate is that it has become polarised around a binary distinction between consensual or majoritarian models of democracy when the contemporary situation is more complex. This article develops the concept of ‘meta-constitutional orientations’ in order to argue that the distinctive element of ‘New’ Labour's approach to constitutional engineering is not that it has shifted the nature of British democracy from one model to another but has, instead, sought to apply different models at the periphery and core: bi-constitutionality.