Skip Navigation


Parliamentary Affairs Advance Access originally published online on November 16, 2007
Parliamentary Affairs 2008 61(1):73-98; doi:10.1093/pa/gsm051
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
61/1/73    most recent
gsm051v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coghill, K.
Right arrow Articles by Grant, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2007]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Hansard Society for Parliamentary Government; all rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Professional Development Programmes for Members of Parliament

Ken Coghill, Peter Holland, Ross Donohue, Kevin Rozzoli and Genevieve Grant

Parliamentarians are engaged in various activities requiring special expertise. The development of relevant skills is a legitimate responsibility of parliamentary administrations as they affect not only individuals but also the performance of the institution. Review of the scholarly literature, publications by a wide range of parliaments and books and personal communications with leading scholars, parliamentary officials and agencies providing parliamentary strengthening programmes find scholarly research to be severely neglected. This project is unique as it involved interviews with Australian Parliamentary Officers responsible for delivery of induction training as well as interviews with newly elected senators who were the recipients of the induction programme. The findings indicated that the induction programme provided to new senators generally met or exceeded participants' expectations; however, it was primarily focused on the functions and operations of the Chamber, rather than developing broader skills. The results also suggested that while the induction programme encompassed many of the features of a well-designed training programme, this was largely due to the professionalism of the Parliamentary Officers responsible for providing it.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.